H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
A. Cherkasov vs P. Annacone H2H: 0-1
P. Annacone holds a 1–0 lead over A. Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, P. Annacone leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, P. Annacone won the 1992 Manchester third round 7-6(4) 6-7(2) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1992* | Manchester | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | P. Annacone | 7-6(4) 6-7(2) 7-6(7) | A. Cherkasov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| P. Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | A. Cherkasov | P. Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |