H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Aaron Krickstein vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-2
Diego Nargiso holds a 2–1 lead over Aaron Krickstein in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Diego Nargiso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Diego Nargiso won the 1992 Miami Masters second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1992* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Diego Nargiso | 7-5 6-3 | Aaron Krickstein | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1989* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Aaron Krickstein | 6-1 6-4 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
| May 11, 1989* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Diego Nargiso | 7-5 1-6 6-4 | Aaron Krickstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Krickstein | #1,299 | #6 | 1,544 | 2,043 | 381 | 252 | 60.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aaron Krickstein | Diego Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1983 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #93 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1984 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,865 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #26 | 1,840 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,879 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,006 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #20 | 1,816 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #28 | 1,825 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #45 | 1,786 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #35 | 1,723 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1092 | 1,534 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |