H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Aaron Krickstein vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 5-1

Aaron Krickstein holds a 5–1 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Aaron Krickstein leads 5–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Aaron Krickstein won the 1994 Japan Open round of 32 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Aaron Krickstein
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aaron Krickstein #31 6-1 6-1 Gianluca Pozzi #136 Match data Apr 7, 1994* R32 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Aaron Krickstein #50 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 6-1 Gianluca Pozzi #72 Match data Sep 1, 1993* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Aaron Krickstein #78 6-3 6-0 Gianluca Pozzi #68 Match data Jul 24, 1993* QF Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Aaron Krickstein #14 6-1 6-2 Gianluca Pozzi #53 Match data Aug 8, 1992* QF Los Angeles Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Gianluca Pozzi #136 6-3 7-6(4) Aaron Krickstein #50 Match data Sep 29, 1991* F Brisbane International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Aaron Krickstein #7 6-4 6-7 6-4 7-5 Gianluca Pozzi #147 Match data Jan 17, 1990* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Aaron Krickstein #1,299 #6 1,544 2,043 381 252 60.2% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Aaron Krickstein Gianluca Pozzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1983 8–5 61.5% #93 1,646 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1984 34–17 66.7% #12 1,865 0 4 — — — — — — —
17 1985 24–20 54.5% #29 1,767 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1986 38–21 64.4% #26 1,841 0 4 — — — — — — —
19 1987 14–12 53.8% #61 1,815 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1988 47–23 67.1% #15 1,877 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 1989 48–19 71.6% #8 2,007 0 7 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0
22 1990 37–26 58.7% #20 1,822 0 7 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0
23 1991 28–21 57.1% #34 1,858 0 7 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0
24 1992 31–15 67.4% #28 1,827 0 8 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0
25 1993 26–19 57.8% #45 1,787 0 9 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0
26 1994 30–26 53.6% #35 1,742 0 9 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1
27 1995 16–24 40.0% #70 1,595 0 9 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1
28 1996 0–4 0.0% #1092 1,536 0 9 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Aaron Krickstein Gianluca Pozzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1983 8 1 9 88.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1984 9 4 13 69.2% 24 9 33 72.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 9 6 15 60.0% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 19 9 28 67.9% 16 8 24 66.7% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 31 13 44 70.5% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 28 8 36 77.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 23 12 35 65.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1991 15 12 27 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1992 19 9 28 67.9% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1993 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1994 22 15 37 59.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1995 11 11 22 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 1996 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 213 114 327 65.1% 112 81 193 58.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 44 48 92 47.8% — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Aaron Krickstein Gianluca Pozzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1983 1646 118.7 — — — — +60 -159 — 52.9% +0.15 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1984 1866 151.2 — — — — -120 +9 — 61.0% +0.67 10–6 (63%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1767 148.6 — — — — +19 +50 — 50.9% +0.23 9–5 (64%) 5–8 (38%) — -1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1841 148.2 — — — — -4 +20 — 58.9% +0.73 14–7 (67%) 12–4 (75%) — -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1815 146.1 — — — — -24 +34 — 57.4% +0.50 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 1877 146.0 — — — — +24 -70 — 59.7% +0.59 17–4 (81%) 12–12 (50%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 2007 155.0 — — — — +31 -248 -376 63.6% +0.92 17–9 (65%) 15–10 (60%) — -1.36 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06
22 1990 1822 155.6 — — — — +56 -31 — 59.5% +0.82 4–5 (44%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.58 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04
23 1991 1858 148.6 +2.17 +0.95 1.076 51.6% +28 -70 — 51.2% +0.10 11–5 (69%) 13–14 (48%) — -1.96 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
24 1992 1827 147.6 +1.05 +3.51 1.134 52.4% +25 -16 — 66.1% +1.20 8–5 (62%) 6–8 (43%) — +1.22 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01
25 1993 1787 146.2 +0.40 +2.91 1.053 51.2% +27 -47 -72 56.1% +0.55 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) — -2.17 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74
26 1994 1742 147.9 +0.73 +1.66 1.058 51.1% +14 +4 -16 54.2% +0.44 8–10 (44%) 11–13 (46%) — -0.64 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.02
27 1995 1595 127.7 -2.33 -1.97 0.850 47.1% +46 +54 +157 42.5% -0.61 5–3 (63%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.56 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.05
28 1996 1537 98.9 -2.75 -0.44 0.777 44.8% +26 — — 30.8% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.20 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) — -1.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.16
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2044 153.8 +0.43 +1.44 1.029 50.7% +21 -17 -76 56.9% +0.52 116–77 (60%) 116–106 (52%) 101.8 -1.29 — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.