H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Aaron Krickstein vs Tomas Smid H2H: 1-1
Aaron Krickstein and Tomas Smid are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on carpet, while Aaron Krickstein leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aaron Krickstein won the 1985 Monte Carlo quarterfinal 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1985* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Aaron Krickstein | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Jan 26, 1984* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 7-5 6-0 | Aaron Krickstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Krickstein | #1,299 | #6 | 1,544 | 2,043 | 381 | 252 | 60.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aaron Krickstein | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1983 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #93 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1984 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,865 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #26 | 1,840 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,879 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,006 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #20 | 1,816 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #28 | 1,825 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1993 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #45 | 1,786 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1994 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #35 | 1,723 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1995 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1092 | 1,534 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |