H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Adrian Garcia vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 0-1

Takao Suzuki holds a 1–0 lead over Adrian Garcia in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Takao Suzuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 2004 Japan Open round of 64 7-6(6) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Adrian Garcia
CHI Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Takao Suzuki #231 7-6(6) 7-6(4) Adrian Garcia #111 Match data Oct 6, 2004* R64 Japan Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Adrian Garcia #1,800 #103 415 1,535 9 25 26.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Adrian Garcia Takao Suzuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0
22 2000 2–2 50.0% #253 1,494 0 0 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0
23 2001 0–1 0.0% #329 1,460 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0
25 2003 0–1 0.0% #297 1,457 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0
26 2004 6–10 37.5% #118 1,476 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0
27 2005 1–4 20.0% #149 1,508 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0
28 2006 0–2 0.0% #226 1,470 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0
29 2007 0–4 0.0% #186 1,442 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0
30 2008 0–1 0.0% #410 1,406 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Adrian Garcia Takao Suzuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2006 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 3 10 13 23.1% 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Adrian Garcia Takao Suzuki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2000 4/4 1.5 1.0 67.0% 70.3% 48.6% 33.3% 46.6% 63.9% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 1/1 2.0 8.0 56.7% 65.8% 44.8% 72.7% 0.0% 56.7% 27.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 1/1 2.0 2.0 75.0% 61.5% 30.8% 66.7% — 53.8% 21.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 16/16 2.6 2.5 59.0% 67.8% 50.5% 53.8% 34.7% 60.8% 32.8% 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3%
27 2005 5/5 1.6 4.4 59.8% 69.9% 46.5% 42.5% 36.3% 60.6% 36.1% 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4%
28 2006 2/2 1.5 2.0 59.1% 56.3% 44.4% 46.5% 20.8% 51.7% 37.2% 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6%
29 2007 4/4 4.8 4.8 50.7% 65.0% 47.9% 40.9% 71.6% 56.5% 29.7% 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2%
30 2008 1/1 8.0 2.0 62.8% 67.1% 60.0% 83.3% 25.0% 64.5% 32.7% 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7%
Career — 34/34 2.6 3.0 59.6% 67.2% 48.6% 49.6% 37.5% 59.9% 33.3% — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Adrian Garcia Takao Suzuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29
22 2000 1494 110.5 +0.25 -1.34 1.060 51.4% — +50 — 66.7% +2.17 — 1–1 — +0.32 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 -0.13
23 2001 1461 95.1 -1.66 -2.08 0.630 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26
25 2003 1457 101.9 +3.33 +1.03 0.461 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.17 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27
26 2004 1477 119.9 -2.13 -2.17 0.837 47.7% +20 +104 — 42.4% -0.58 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 100.1 +0.22 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23
27 2005 1508 103.6 -1.04 -1.21 0.915 47.6% — — — 22.2% -1.22 — 0–1 — +0.33 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08
28 2006 1470 95.5 -1.66 -2.82 0.770 43.7% — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.08 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
29 2007 1443 102.0 -2.34 -2.53 0.683 44.1% +24 — — 20.0% -2.10 0–2 0–1 — +0.10 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 +0.05
30 2008 1406 96.0 -1.19 -0.87 0.921 49.1% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.13 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05
31 2009 1380 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15
32 2010 1408 103.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1536 109.3 -1.48 -1.88 0.830 47.1% +21 +86 — 34.3% -0.94 1–6 (14%) 7–8 (47%) 94.5 +3.53 — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.