H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Adrian Garcia vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 0-1
Takao Suzuki holds a 1–0 lead over Adrian Garcia in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Takao Suzuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 2004 Tokyo second round 7-6(6) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2004* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Takao Suzuki | 7-6(6) 7-6(4) | Adrian Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Garcia | #1,800 | #103 | 415 | 1,536 | 9 | 25 | 26.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Takao Suzuki | #1,016 | #102 | 470 | 1,669 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adrian Garcia | Takao Suzuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #262 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #225 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #205 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #149 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #471 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #509 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |