H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Adriano Panatta vs Cliff Richey H2H: 0-1
Cliff Richey holds a 1–0 lead over Adriano Panatta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cliff Richey leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cliff Richey won the 1971 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1971* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Cliff Richey | 6-2 6-2 6-4 | Adriano Panatta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriano Panatta | #807 | #4 | 0 | 2,172 | 379 | 226 | 62.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Cliff Richey | #662 | #16 | 0 | 2,112 | 488 | 224 | 68.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adriano Panatta | Cliff Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 46–15 | 75.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1973 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 64–18 | 78.0% | — | 1,946 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1974 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #34 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 88–24 | 78.6% | — | 2,047 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | 1975 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #14 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 67–23 | 74.4% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1976 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #7 | 2,020 | 1 | 7 | 1972 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1977 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,951 | 1 | 8 | 1973 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1978 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,933 | 1 | 9 | 1974 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,891 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 1979 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #28 | 1,867 | 1 | 10 | 1975 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,855 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1980 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #32 | 1,937 | 1 | 11 | 1976 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1981 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #40 | 1,787 | 1 | 11 | 1977 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #97 | 1,714 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #96 | 1,708 | 1 | 11 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,705 | 0 | 23 |
| 32 | 1983 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,642 | 1 | 11 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,693 | 0 | 23 |