H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Adriano Panatta vs Jim Osborne H2H: 1-1
Adriano Panatta and Jim Osborne are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on carpet, while Adriano Panatta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Adriano Panatta won the 1972 Indianapolis second round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1972 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Adriano Panatta | 6-1 7-6 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Feb 10, 1972* | Des Moines | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jim Osborne | 6-7 6-2 6-1 | Adriano Panatta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriano Panatta | #807 | #4 | 0 | 2,172 | 379 | 226 | 62.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adriano Panatta | Jim Osborne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #34 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #14 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #7 | 2,020 | 1 | 7 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,951 | 1 | 8 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,933 | 1 | 9 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #28 | 1,867 | 1 | 10 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #32 | 1,937 | 1 | 11 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1981 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #40 | 1,787 | 1 | 11 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #96 | 1,708 | 1 | 11 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1983 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,642 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |