H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Adriano Panatta vs Mark Cox H2H: 2-1
Adriano Panatta holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Adriano Panatta leads 2–0 on clay, while Mark Cox leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Adriano Panatta won the 1976 Rome Wct quarterfinal 4-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1976* | Rome Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Adriano Panatta | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1974* | Tokyo Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Adriano Panatta | 6-0 6-2 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Feb 16, 1974* | Bologna Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Mark Cox | 6-1 6-4 | Adriano Panatta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriano Panatta | #807 | #4 | 0 | 2,172 | 379 | 226 | 62.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adriano Panatta | Mark Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #34 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #14 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1976 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #7 | 2,020 | 1 | 7 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1977 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,951 | 1 | 8 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1978 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,933 | 1 | 9 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1979 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #28 | 1,867 | 1 | 10 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1980 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #32 | 1,937 | 1 | 11 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1981 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #40 | 1,787 | 1 | 11 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #96 | 1,708 | 1 | 11 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1983 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,642 | 1 | 11 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 |