H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriano Panatta vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 0-1
Nikola Pilic holds a 1–0 lead over Adriano Panatta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nikola Pilic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikola Pilic won the 1973 Roland Garros semifinal 6-4 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1973* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Nikola Pilic | 6-4 6-3 6-2 | Adriano Panatta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriano Panatta | #807 | #4 | 0 | 2,172 | 379 | 226 | 62.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adriano Panatta | Nikola Pilic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #34 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #14 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #7 | 2,020 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,951 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,933 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #28 | 1,867 | 1 | 10 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1980 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #32 | 1,937 | 1 | 11 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1981 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #40 | 1,787 | 1 | 11 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #96 | 1,708 | 1 | 11 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1983 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,642 | 1 | 11 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 |