H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Adriano Panatta vs Rod Laver H2H: 0-2
Rod Laver holds a 2–0 lead over Adriano Panatta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rod Laver won the 1975 Boston third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1975* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Rod Laver | 7-6 6-2 | Adriano Panatta | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1974* | Tuscon | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Rod Laver | 6-4 6-2 | Adriano Panatta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriano Panatta | #807 | #4 | 0 | 2,172 | 379 | 226 | 62.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adriano Panatta | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #34 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #14 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #7 | 2,020 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,951 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,933 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #28 | 1,867 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #32 | 1,937 | 1 | 11 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1981 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #40 | 1,787 | 1 | 11 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #96 | 1,708 | 1 | 11 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | 1983 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,642 | 1 | 11 | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |