H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Adriano Panatta vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 3-0
Adriano Panatta holds a 3–0 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Adriano Panatta leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Adriano Panatta won the 1978 Madrid fourth round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1978* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Adriano Panatta | 6-2 7-6 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1974* | Bologna Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Adriano Panatta | 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| May 7, 1970* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Adriano Panatta | 6-4 9-7 3-6 4-3 (ret.) | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriano Panatta | #807 | #4 | 0 | 2,172 | 379 | 226 | 62.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adriano Panatta | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #34 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #14 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #7 | 2,020 | 1 | 7 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1977 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,951 | 1 | 8 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1978 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,933 | 1 | 9 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1979 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #28 | 1,867 | 1 | 10 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1980 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #32 | 1,937 | 1 | 11 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1981 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #40 | 1,787 | 1 | 11 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #96 | 1,708 | 1 | 11 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1983 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,642 | 1 | 11 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |