H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Agustin Calleri vs Alex Calatrava H2H: 1-1
Agustin Calleri and Alex Calatrava are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Agustin Calleri leads 1–0 on clay, while Alex Calatrava leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agustin Calleri won the 2005 Vina Del Mar third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Agustin Calleri | 6-3 6-2 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2001* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alex Calatrava | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Agustin Calleri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agustin Calleri | #894 | #16 | 1,405 | 1,902 | 199 | 182 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agustin Calleri | Alex Calatrava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #62 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #67 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #24 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2007 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #42 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #60 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2009 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #391 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 |