H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Agustin Calleri vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 1-1
Agustin Calleri and Cecil Mamiit are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Agustin Calleri leads 1–0 on clay, while Cecil Mamiit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agustin Calleri won the 2003 Vina Del Mar third round 0-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Agustin Calleri | 0-6 6-3 6-4 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2002* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Cecil Mamiit | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Agustin Calleri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agustin Calleri | #894 | #16 | 1,405 | 1,902 | 199 | 182 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agustin Calleri | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #62 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #67 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #24 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #42 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #60 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #391 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |