H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Agustin Calleri vs Emilio Benfele Alvarez H2H: 1-0
Agustin Calleri holds a 1–0 lead over Emilio Benfele Alvarez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agustin Calleri leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agustin Calleri won the 2000 Santiago fourth round 6-7(6) 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2000* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Agustin Calleri | 6-7(6) 6-3 7-6(4) | Emilio Benfele Alvarez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agustin Calleri | #894 | #16 | 1,405 | 1,902 | 199 | 182 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Emilio Benfele Alvarez | #1,529 | #81 | 591 | 1,670 | 45 | 67 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agustin Calleri | Emilio Benfele Alvarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #62 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #67 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #103 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #190 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #24 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #125 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #42 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #60 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #391 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |