H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 07:16 UTC
Agustin Calleri vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 0-1
Marc Gicquel holds a 1–0 lead over Agustin Calleri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2009 Auckland third round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2009* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marc Gicquel | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Agustin Calleri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agustin Calleri | #894 | #16 | 1,405 | 1,902 | 199 | 182 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agustin Calleri | Marc Gicquel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #62 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #67 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #24 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #42 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #60 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #391 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |