H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi vs Luka Gregorc

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi vs Luka Gregorc.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi
PAK Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Luka Gregorc
SLO Age 42 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi #325 6-3 7-6(4) Luka Gregorc #180 Match data Jul 19, 2009 Q2 Q Indianapolis ATP 250 Hard
Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi #207 6-7(0) 6-2 7-6(4) Luka Gregorc #238 Match data Sep 22, 2008 Q2 Q Bangkok International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi #1,190 #125 359 1,642 5 10 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Luka Gregorc #1,167 #172 373 1,679 6 7 46.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi Luka Gregorc
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #523 1,482 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #418 1,496 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #463 1,531 0 0
24 2004 0–1 0.0% #218 1,468 0 0 2008 4–3 57.1% #219 1,655 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #358 1,582 0 0
26 2006 0–1 0.0% #484 1,437 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2007 4–4 50.0% #129 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2008 1–4 20.0% #300 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi Luka Gregorc
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 4.0 7.0 52.9% 77.8% 31.3% 71.4% 0.0% 55.9% 27.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 7.0 7.5 64.2% 72.7% 37.0% 32.5% 43.8% 60.0% 38.8%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 5.0 4.5 60.1% 71.3% 47.5% 20.0% 36.4% 61.6% 36.5%
24 2004 1/1 8.0 5.0 70.1% 65.6% 50.0% 66.7% — 60.9% 20.0% 2008 7/7 8.0 5.0 60.5% 69.4% 47.6% 49.4% 63.3% 60.9% 37.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 15.0 8.0 64.2% 77.3% 44.4% 83.3% 28.6% 65.6% 26.6%
26 2006 1/1 11.0 6.0 68.6% 71.1% 52.6% 60.0% 25.0% 65.3% 28.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 8/8 10.3 4.0 61.4% 76.7% 49.5% 61.0% 29.7% 66.0% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 5/5 13.2 3.8 59.9% 77.7% 43.2% 65.8% 27.8% 63.9% 22.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 15/15 11.1 4.1 62.0% 75.9% 47.6% 62.9% 26.8% 64.9% 28.2% — 13/13 7.6 5.7 60.7% 71.5% 44.5% 46.6% 48.6% 60.8% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi Luka Gregorc
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2000 1471 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 1471 106.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1483 96.8 -0.86 -0.36 0.615 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.25
22 2002 1469 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1497 109.3 +2.93 +1.41 0.970 48.6% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.08
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1532 104.7 +1.06 +0.86 0.950 48.5% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06
24 2004 1469 103.2 -1.64 -2.17 0.512 45.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.11 2008 1656 118.4 -2.02 +0.77 0.963 50.3% +25 — — 47.1% +0.12 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 104.4 -0.13
25 2005 1439 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1582 103.0 +2.23 +0.88 0.773 46.9% — — — 25.0% -0.50 — 0–2 — -0.24
26 2006 1437 105.6 +0.06 +3.34 0.819 47.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.17 2010 1469 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 1607 115.7 +1.19 -1.19 0.958 49.4% — — +129 50.0% -0.15 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.54 2011 1499 108.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 1581 110.1 -0.13 -3.70 0.630 44.4% -72 — — 25.0% -1.50 — 2–2 (50%) — -0.17 2012 1495 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1572 109.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1504 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 1553 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 1534 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1526 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1545 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 1519 103.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1643 111.9 +0.49 -1.79 0.804 47.3% -72 — +129 37.8% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 6–6 (50%) 99.5 +0.60 — 1680 109.0 -0.37 +0.80 0.919 48.9% +25 — — 41.9% -0.29 3–0 (100%) 2–6 (25%) 102.2 -0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.