H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Albert Costa vs Alberto Martin H2H: 2-2
Albert Costa and Alberto Martin are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 2–1 on clay, while Alberto Martin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alberto Martin won the 2003 US Open second round 6-3 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Alberto Martin | 6-3 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2002* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Albert Costa | 7-5 6-3 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1999* | Palermo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Albert Costa | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1999* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Alberto Martin | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Albert Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |