H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Albert Costa vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 2-0
Albert Costa holds a 2–0 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 1995 Hamburg Masters second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1995* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-4 6-2 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1994* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-0 4-6 7-5 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Andrei Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |