H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Albert Costa vs Andrei Medvedev H2H: 2-2
Albert Costa and Andrei Medvedev are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 2–1 on clay, while Andrei Medvedev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Medvedev won the 2000 Estoril third round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2000* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Medvedev | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| May 6, 1998* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-3 1-6 7-6(3) | Andrei Medvedev | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1997* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Medvedev | 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1995* | Estoril | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-2 6-3 | Andrei Medvedev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Andrei Medvedev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |