H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Albert Costa vs Christophe Rochus H2H: 1-2
Christophe Rochus holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Christophe Rochus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2004 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-1 6-2 7-5 | Christophe Rochus | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2004* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Christophe Rochus | 6-4 6-3 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Christophe Rochus | 6-3 6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | Albert Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Christophe Rochus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |