H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Albert Costa vs Flavio Saretta H2H: 1-1
Albert Costa and Flavio Saretta are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 1–0 on clay, while Flavio Saretta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2004 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-2 6-7(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-2 6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 | Flavio Saretta | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2003* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Flavio Saretta | 3-0 (ret.) | Albert Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Flavio Saretta | #950 | #44 | 839 | 1,792 | 68 | 74 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Flavio Saretta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #98 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #111 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #118 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 2007 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #188 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |