H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Albert Costa vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 1-0

Albert Costa holds a 1–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Costa leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2000 Paris Masters round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Costa

ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H

1 – 0

1 main draw meetings

Gianluca Pozzi

ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Albert Costa #32	6-2 6-4	Gianluca Pozzi #45	Match data	Nov 18, 2000*	R16	Paris Masters	Masters 1000	Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Albert Costa	#669	#6	2,385	2,004	369	265	58.2%	1	1	0	2	8	12
Gianluca Pozzi	#1,466	#40	864	1,783	173	258	40.1%	0	0	0	0	1	1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Albert Costa							Gianluca Pozzi
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
18	1993	2–2	50.0%	#221	1,521	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1994	15–18	45.5%	#52	1,583	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1995	33–22	60.0%	#24	1,759	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1996	47–27	63.5%	#13	1,745	0	4	1986	0–2	0.0%	#277	1,480	0	0
22	1997	40–20	66.7%	#19	1,819	0	6	1987	1–2	33.3%	#153	1,501	0	0
23	1998	47–26	64.4%	#14	1,761	0	8	1988	4–8	33.3%	#165	1,507	0	0
24	1999	40–22	64.5%	#18	1,810	0	11	1989	7–11	38.9%	#179	1,531	0	0
25	2000	29–23	55.8%	#26	1,761	0	11	1990	1–8	11.1%	#185	1,459	0	0
26	2001	27–22	55.1%	#40	1,801	0	11	1991	16–13	55.2%	#76	1,696	0	1
27	2002	32–22	59.3%	#9	1,795	1	12	1992	28–28	50.0%	#68	1,708	0	1
28	2003	23–20	53.5%	#25	1,766	1	12	1993	13–26	33.3%	#107	1,560	0	1
29	2004	19–22	46.3%	#56	1,666	1	12	1994	11–18	37.9%	#93	1,608	0	1
30	2005	13–17	43.3%	#116	1,620	1	12	1995	10–22	31.2%	#138	1,555	0	1
31	2006	2–2	50.0%	#623	1,633	1	12	1996	7–14	33.3%	#107	1,531	0	1
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1997	3–7	30.0%	#101	1,508	0	1
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1998	22–27	44.9%	#61	1,653	0	1
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1999	16–26	38.1%	#94	1,602	0	1
35	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2000	27–23	54.0%	#43	1,724	0	1
36	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2001	7–23	23.3%	#155	1,494	0	1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Albert Costa																	Gianluca Pozzi
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
18	1993	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1994	0	1	1	0.0%	15	16	31	48.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1995	1	2	3	33.3%	32	19	51	62.7%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1996	15	11	26	57.7%	31	9	40	77.5%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	4	4	0.0%	1986	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1997	19	11	30	63.3%	21	7	28	75.0%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	1987	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1998	12	13	25	48.0%	34	9	43	79.1%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	1988	4	5	9	44.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
24	1999	8	10	18	44.4%	30	9	39	76.9%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1989	7	10	17	41.2%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
25	2000	12	13	25	48.0%	14	8	22	63.6%	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	1990	0	5	5	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
26	2001	8	8	16	50.0%	17	12	29	58.6%	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	1991	11	8	19	57.9%	—	—	—	—	2	3	5	40.0%	3	2	5	60.0%
27	2002	7	11	18	38.9%	25	8	33	75.8%	—	—	—	—	0	3	3	0.0%	1992	17	18	35	48.6%	1	3	4	25.0%	4	4	8	50.0%	6	3	9	66.7%
28	2003	11	11	22	50.0%	11	8	19	57.9%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	1993	8	15	23	34.8%	0	2	2	0.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	6	9	33.3%
29	2004	6	10	16	37.5%	13	10	23	56.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1994	7	11	18	38.9%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	4	2	6	66.7%
30	2005	3	5	8	37.5%	10	12	22	45.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	3	11	14	21.4%	0	2	2	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	4	6	10	40.0%
31	2006	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1996	3	7	10	30.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1997	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	3	3	0.0%
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1998	12	13	25	48.0%	2	6	8	25.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	4	5	9	44.4%
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1999	11	14	25	44.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	3	3	6	50.0%	1	4	5	20.0%
35	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2000	12	14	26	46.2%	2	3	5	40.0%	10	4	14	71.4%	3	2	5	60.0%
36	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2001	6	12	18	33.3%	0	5	5	0.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	0	2	2	0.0%
Career	—	102	106	208	49.0%	257	131	388	66.2%	2	7	9	22.2%	8	21	29	27.6%	—	105	149	254	41.3%	6	34	40	15.0%	32	36	68	47.1%	30	39	69	43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Albert Costa																Gianluca Pozzi
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
18	1993	1522	107.4	—	—	—	—	—	+38	—	45.5%	-0.36	2–1 (67%)	1–1	—	+0.12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1994	1583	132.9	—	—	—	—	—	+66	—	40.5%	-0.53	7–4 (64%)	1–4 (20%)	—	+0.06	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1995	1760	146.1	—	—	—	—	-261	+67	—	61.1%	+0.65	8–10 (44%)	8–4 (67%)	—	+0.33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1996	1745	145.0	—	—	—	—	-165	+221	-169	58.8%	+0.76	17–10 (63%)	12–19 (39%)	—	+2.79	1986	1480	97.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.75	—	—	—	+0.06
22	1997	1819	155.1	—	—	—	—	-84	+151	—	64.4%	+0.93	4–8 (33%)	10–10 (50%)	—	-1.36	1987	1501	105.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	37.5%	-1.25	—	—	—	-0.04
23	1998	1762	150.6	—	—	—	—	-117	+288	—	60.8%	+0.70	14–7 (67%)	12–5 (71%)	—	-0.41	1988	1508	113.8	—	—	—	—	+65	—	—	33.3%	-1.00	1–3 (25%)	2–2 (50%)	—	+0.72
24	1999	1810	148.6	—	—	—	—	-141	+220	—	60.4%	+0.68	13–6 (68%)	15–9 (63%)	—	-1.51	1989	1532	111.7	—	—	—	—	+42	—	—	41.7%	-0.56	3–4 (43%)	2–2 (50%)	—	+1.01
25	2000	1761	143.3	—	—	—	—	-86	+190	—	53.8%	+0.47	8–8 (50%)	6–11 (35%)	—	+0.03	1990	1460	99.5	—	—	—	—	+55	—	—	22.7%	-2.14	0–2	3–0 (100%)	—	+0.74
26	2001	1801	145.2	—	—	—	—	-38	+31	—	53.0%	+0.15	7–8 (47%)	11–6 (65%)	—	-0.92	1991	1697	135.0	—	—	—	—	+11	—	-143	52.8%	+0.04	6–6 (50%)	5–5 (50%)	—	-0.02
27	2002	1796	149.7	—	—	—	—	-97	+231	—	56.1%	+0.31	12–6 (67%)	10–10 (50%)	—	-0.07	1992	1709	135.4	—	—	—	—	+34	-217	-129	46.6%	-0.12	17–7 (71%)	6–10 (38%)	—	+0.05
28	2003	1766	140.2	+1.04	-0.52	0.975	49.7%	-38	+145	—	53.3%	+0.12	9–9 (50%)	11–12 (48%)	—	+0.43	1993	1560	119.9	—	—	—	—	+30	—	+12	35.1%	-1.37	7–7 (50%)	11–4 (73%)	—	-1.02
29	2004	1666	140.3	-0.80	+0.58	0.975	49.6%	+12	+168	—	47.6%	-0.13	5–8 (38%)	7–11 (39%)	—	+0.16	1994	1608	117.5	—	—	—	—	+43	—	-94	40.5%	-0.71	6–6 (50%)	5–6 (45%)	—	+1.46
30	2005	1621	122.1	-2.00	-1.30	0.884	48.1%	+8	+73	—	38.5%	-0.75	3–3 (50%)	4–8 (33%)	—	+0.05	1995	1555	119.8	—	—	—	—	+23	—	+2	35.1%	-1.13	1–4 (20%)	2–6 (25%)	—	+0.52
31	2006	1633	114.2	-1.10	-0.27	0.951	48.7%	—	+74	—	54.5%	+0.18	1–2 (33%)	1–0	—	-0.35	1996	1531	114.7	—	—	—	—	+18	—	+61	37.3%	-0.82	2–3 (40%)	2–2 (50%)	—	+0.29
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1997	1509	109.9	—	—	—	—	+20	—	—	31.8%	-1.36	1–1	2–0	—	+0.87
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1998	1654	134.1	—	—	—	—	+15	-252	-36	46.2%	-0.16	6–6 (50%)	8–9 (47%)	—	+0.09
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1999	1602	130.9	—	—	—	—	+37	-205	+16	41.8%	-0.45	6–11 (35%)	4–5 (44%)	—	-0.01
35	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2000	1725	134.1	—	—	—	—	-41	-313	+22	50.8%	+0.11	12–8 (60%)	12–5 (71%)	—	-1.12
36	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2001	1494	121.1	—	—	—	—	+82	-133	+119	28.8%	-1.23	1–7 (13%)	3–5 (38%)	—	+0.16
37	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2002	1486	101.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2005	150.8	-0.47	-0.32	0.950	49.2%	-89	+157	-169	55.7%	+0.39	110–90 (55%)	109–110 (50%)	99.9	-0.10	—	1784	130.8	—	—	—	—	+26	-227	-13	41.5%	-0.58	69–75 (48%)	67–61 (52%)	104.3	+0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Albert Costa's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Alex Corretja	7	8	15	May 5, 2004	H2H
Felix Mantilla	8	5	13	Jul 15, 2004	H2H
Andrea Gaudenzi	8	3	11	Jan 2, 2003	H2H
Slava Dosedel	8	3	11	Apr 25, 2001	H2H
Tim Henman	2	7	9	Oct 21, 2004	H2H

Gianluca Pozzi's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Jan Siemerink	4	5	9	Jun 14, 2001	H2H
Byron Black	1	7	8	Jul 5, 2000	H2H
Michael Chang	0	7	7	Apr 29, 1999	H2H
Kenneth Carlsen	0	6	6	Jul 12, 2001	H2H
Jeff Tarango	4	2	6	Mar 14, 2001	H2H