H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Albert Costa vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 4-0
Albert Costa holds a 4–0 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2004 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-5 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2004* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Albert Costa | 7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| Jun 7, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Albert Costa | 7-5 3-6 6-7(3) 6-4 6-0 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2002* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2001* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Albert Costa | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |