H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Albert Costa vs Guillermo Coria H2H: 2-2
Albert Costa and Guillermo Coria are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2003 Miami Masters fourth round 7-5 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2003* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Albert Costa | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | Guillermo Coria | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2002* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2002* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Guillermo Coria | 6-2 6-3 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2001* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Albert Costa | 7-5 6-3 | Guillermo Coria | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,114 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Guillermo Coria | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,009 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,923 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,671 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |