H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Albert Costa vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 1-0
Albert Costa holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Costa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 1994 Prague third round 6-3 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 1994* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 |