H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Albert Costa vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 1-0
Albert Costa holds a 1–0 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Costa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 1996 Indian Wells Masters third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1996* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Albert Costa | 7-5 6-2 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Jakob Hlasek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 |