H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Albert Costa vs Jan Siemerink H2H: 1-0
Albert Costa holds a 1–0 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Costa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 1997 Rome Masters third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1997* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-4 6-2 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Jan Siemerink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 |