H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Albert Costa vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 0-3
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 3–0 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2003 Sydney third round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2003* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2002* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-1 7-6(4) | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2002* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-0 7-6(2) | Albert Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |