H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Albert Costa vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 2-1

Albert Costa holds a 2–1 lead over Markus Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Albert Costa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2001 Vienna Open round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Costa
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Markus Hipfl
AUT Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Costa #33 6-3 3-6 6-4 Markus Hipfl #81 Match data Oct 11, 2001* R32 Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Albert Costa #65 7-5 6-2 Markus Hipfl #100 Match data Jul 27, 2001* R16 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Markus Hipfl #104 6-4 6-2 Albert Costa #38 Match data Apr 12, 2001* R32 Estoril Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 2,004 369 265 58.2% 1 1 0 2 8 12
Markus Hipfl #1,538 #63 678 1,686 55 78 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Costa Markus Hipfl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #768 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #1275 1,485 0 0
18 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,521 0 0 1996 1–2 33.3% #451 1,493 0 0
19 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #231 1,462 0 0
20 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,759 0 1 1998 3–3 50.0% #137 1,507 0 0
21 1996 47–27 63.5% #13 1,745 0 4 1999 15–15 50.0% #76 1,591 0 0
22 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,819 0 6 2000 8–12 40.0% #119 1,571 0 0
23 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,761 0 8 2001 14–18 43.8% #76 1,574 0 0
24 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11 2002 11–17 39.3% #125 1,566 0 0
25 2000 29–23 55.8% #26 1,761 0 11 2003 3–6 33.3% #279 1,509 0 0
26 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,801 0 11 — — — — — — —
27 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,795 1 12 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,476 0 0
28 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,766 1 12 — — — — — — —
29 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,666 1 12 — — — — — — —
30 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,620 1 12 — — — — — — —
31 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,633 1 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Costa Markus Hipfl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1993 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 15 16 31 48.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 32 19 51 62.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1996 15 11 26 57.7% 31 9 40 77.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 21 7 28 75.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 34 9 43 79.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 30 9 39 76.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2000 12 13 25 48.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 2001 8 8 16 50.0% 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 7 11 18 38.9% 25 8 33 75.8% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 102 106 208 49.0% 257 131 388 66.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 8 21 29 27.6% — 5 17 22 22.7% 49 53 102 48.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Costa Markus Hipfl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1491 99.9 +1.43 -2.60 0.570 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1485 101.0 +0.52 +1.20 0.633 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
18 1993 1522 107.4 — — — — — +38 — 45.5% -0.36 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.12 1996 1493 109.0 -1.54 +0.61 0.895 47.2% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.24
19 1994 1583 132.9 — — — — — +66 — 40.5% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.06 1997 1462 98.2 -0.14 -2.54 0.995 49.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 1995 1760 146.1 — — — — -261 +67 — 61.1% +0.65 8–10 (44%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.33 1998 1508 114.6 -0.71 +0.31 0.894 47.3% — +41 — 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.23
21 1996 1745 145.0 — — — — -165 +221 -169 58.8% +0.76 17–10 (63%) 12–19 (39%) — +2.79 1999 1591 128.5 -0.84 +2.00 1.075 50.9% -78 +74 — 52.6% +0.26 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.06
22 1997 1819 155.1 — — — — -84 +151 — 64.4% +0.93 4–8 (33%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.36 2000 1571 126.9 -1.56 +0.32 0.972 49.4% -93 +109 — 43.1% -0.69 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.49
23 1998 1762 150.6 — — — — -117 +288 — 60.8% +0.70 14–7 (67%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.41 2001 1574 134.5 -2.21 +1.33 0.953 49.0% -129 +138 -96 48.6% -0.18 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.27
24 1999 1810 148.6 — — — — -141 +220 — 60.4% +0.68 13–6 (68%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.51 2002 1567 127.4 -2.40 +0.71 0.934 48.7% -69 +91 — 47.1% -0.21 0–7 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.81
25 2000 1761 143.3 — — — — -86 +190 — 53.8% +0.47 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.03 2003 1509 95.1 -5.51 -3.56 0.693 43.6% — +73 — 33.3% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.38
26 2001 1801 145.2 — — — — -38 +31 — 53.0% +0.15 7–8 (47%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.92 2004 1495 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1796 149.7 — — — — -97 +231 — 56.1% +0.31 12–6 (67%) 10–10 (50%) — -0.07 2005 1477 99.0 +0.24 -0.09 0.886 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.22
28 2003 1766 140.2 +1.04 -0.52 0.975 49.7% -38 +145 — 53.3% +0.12 9–9 (50%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1666 140.3 -0.80 +0.58 0.975 49.6% +12 +168 — 47.6% -0.13 5–8 (38%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1621 122.1 -2.00 -1.30 0.884 48.1% +8 +73 — 38.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1633 114.2 -1.10 -0.27 0.951 48.7% — +74 — 54.5% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2005 150.8 -0.47 -0.32 0.950 49.2% -89 +157 -169 55.7% +0.39 110–90 (55%) 109–110 (50%) 99.9 -0.10 — 1687 129.6 -1.94 +0.67 0.942 48.7% -90 +96 -96 46.1% -0.38 13–27 (33%) 17–14 (55%) 95.8 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.