H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Albert Costa vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 1-3
Max Mirnyi holds a 3–1 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Max Mirnyi leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2005 Hamburg Masters second round 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Albert Costa | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2005* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Max Mirnyi | 7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2001* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-3 6-4 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-4 6-1 6-4 | Albert Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Max Mirnyi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |