H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Albert Costa vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 1-3
Nicolas Escude holds a 3–1 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 2–0 on carpet, while Albert Costa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2003 Rotterdam third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2003* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-3 6-3 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2002* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Nicolas Escude | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2002* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nicolas Escude | 7-5 3-6 6-1 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| May 19, 2001* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-3 6-0 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |