H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Albert Costa vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-2

Albert Costa and Nicolas Kiefer are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Albert Costa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2003 Hamburg Open round of 64 6-4 6-4.

ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Costa #8 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #75 Match data May 14, 2003* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Albert Costa #35 3-6 6-0 7-6(6) Nicolas Kiefer #42 Match data Oct 17, 2001* R64 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Nicolas Kiefer #4 6-2 6-0 Albert Costa #18 Match data Feb 12, 2000* SF Dubai Tennis Championships ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Nicolas Kiefer #39 6-3 7-6(3) Albert Costa #16 Match data Feb 12, 1999* R16 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 2,004 369 265 58.2% 1 1 0 2 8 12
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,995 347 255 57.6% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Costa Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,521 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,563 0 0
19 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,799 0 1
20 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,759 0 1 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,792 0 1
21 1996 47–27 63.5% #13 1,745 0 4 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,922 0 4
22 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,819 0 6 2000 30–16 65.2% #20 1,900 0 6
23 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,761 0 8 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,763 0 6
24 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,717 0 6
25 2000 29–23 55.8% #26 1,761 0 11 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,801 0 11 2004 34–20 63.0% #21 1,886 0 6
27 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,795 1 12 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,862 0 6
28 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,766 1 12 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,863 0 6
29 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,666 1 12 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,906 0 6
30 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,620 1 12 2008 22–17 56.4% #38 1,889 0 6
31 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,633 1 12 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,762 0 6
32 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,722 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Costa Nicolas Kiefer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1995 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 15 16 31 48.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 11 5 16 68.8%
20 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 32 19 51 62.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 24 15 39 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1996 15 11 26 57.7% 31 9 40 77.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1999 41 15 56 73.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 34 9 43 79.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 30 9 39 76.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 10 15 25 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2000 12 13 25 48.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2001 8 8 16 50.0% 17 12 29 58.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 30 14 44 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2002 7 11 18 38.9% 25 8 33 75.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 2005 15 13 28 53.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
28 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 17 9 26 65.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 10 12 22 45.5% 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4%
31 2006 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 102 106 208 49.0% 257 131 388 66.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 8 21 29 27.6% 221 145 366 60.4% 47 55 102 46.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 35 25 60 58.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 116/118 of Albert Costa's and 537/601 of Nicolas Kiefer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Costa Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 —/— 1995 6/6 4.7 2.3 61.5% 72.6% 51.3% 62.7% 44.1% 64.8% 36.3%
18 —/— 1996 11/16 6.1 2.5 52.2% 76.6% 47.8% 53.2% 49.7% 62.7% 39.8%
19 —/— 1997 37/42 7.9 3.5 55.2% 77.0% 48.3% 60.5% 52.5% 64.1% 36.7%
20 —/— 1998 49/56 6.2 4.7 53.7% 74.8% 47.8% 55.1% 44.4% 62.5% 39.0%
21 —/— 1999 56/74 6.6 4.3 51.5% 75.7% 53.2% 61.8% 43.5% 64.7% 40.4%
22 —/— 2000 38/46 6.4 4.3 52.7% 74.9% 52.3% 61.7% 48.3% 64.3% 40.1%
23 —/— 2001 44/51 6.3 4.1 50.3% 71.1% 48.8% 54.0% 50.7% 60.0% 40.0%
24 —/— 2002 40/43 6.2 4.5 52.6% 74.1% 47.8% 58.8% 50.7% 61.5% 37.6%
25 —/— 2003 36/36 6.5 3.8 50.8% 73.1% 49.9% 58.1% 44.7% 61.8% 37.4%
26 —/— 2004 51/54 7.3 3.8 54.9% 77.8% 48.4% 61.1% 41.4% 64.5% 38.7%
27 —/— 2005 52/53 7.6 3.8 53.4% 74.2% 51.4% 56.4% 51.3% 63.6% 40.9%
28 2003 41/43 5.9 2.7 59.8% 70.0% 51.6% 59.1% 40.0% 62.4% 36.7% 2006 21/22 7.4 4.0 51.7% 72.0% 50.1% 59.5% 43.3% 61.3% 40.2%
29 2004 41/41 5.3 2.2 59.9% 67.9% 50.4% 51.2% 41.3% 60.9% 38.1% 2007 30/31 6.7 2.5 57.0% 79.9% 51.6% 64.6% 33.9% 67.8% 38.1%
30 2005 30/30 2.4 2.1 66.6% 65.4% 49.2% 55.5% 41.3% 59.6% 35.7% 2008 34/39 7.2 2.4 53.6% 76.3% 51.9% 55.4% 44.9% 64.9% 39.6%
31 2006 4/4 2.0 2.5 72.4% 60.5% 44.1% 40.4% 35.0% 56.2% 41.7% 2009 28/28 7.7 3.9 52.0% 75.0% 47.3% 62.9% 45.8% 61.9% 35.4%
32 —/— 2010 4/4 11.3 6.5 51.8% 77.7% 47.3% 55.7% 31.0% 63.0% 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Costa Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1489 97.0 0.0% -4.00 +0.05
17 1995 1528 117.0 +1.19 -1.22 1.032 51.3% +26 50.0% 0.00 1–1 +0.08
18 1993 1522 107.4 +38 45.5% -0.36 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.12 1996 1563 122.9 +0.33 +1.12 1.067 50.9% +8 -24 44.1% +0.09 0–1 2–3 (40%) +0.80
19 1994 1583 132.9 +66 40.5% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) +0.06 1997 1799 139.8 +1.52 -0.54 1.021 50.8% -25 -229 -48 55.6% +0.30 14–3 (82%) 8–7 (53%) +0.64
20 1995 1760 146.1 -261 +67 61.1% +0.65 8–10 (44%) 8–4 (67%) +0.33 1998 1792 151.1 +0.77 +1.69 1.039 50.9% +29 -161 -60 55.6% +0.37 10–11 (48%) 12–8 (60%) -0.30
21 1996 1745 145.0 -165 +221 -169 58.8% +0.76 17–10 (63%) 12–19 (39%) +2.79 1999 1923 157.7 +2.57 +3.33 1.144 52.6% +23 -302 -126 65.4% +0.99 15–6 (71%) 16–8 (67%) +0.49
22 1997 1819 155.1 -84 +151 64.4% +0.93 4–8 (33%) 10–10 (50%) -1.36 2000 1900 146.0 +2.09 +2.25 1.124 52.3% +54 -332 -120 61.3% +0.85 9–2 (82%) 7–6 (54%) -0.03
23 1998 1762 150.6 -117 +288 60.8% +0.70 14–7 (67%) 12–5 (71%) -0.41 2001 1763 149.2 -1.17 +2.22 1.001 50.2% +25 -132 +43 53.5% +0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–5 (58%) -2.55
24 1999 1810 148.6 -141 +220 60.4% +0.68 13–6 (68%) 15–9 (63%) -1.51 2002 1718 142.5 -0.77 +1.14 0.977 49.8% +5 -139 +119 46.5% -0.05 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) -0.90
25 2000 1761 143.3 -86 +190 53.8% +0.47 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) +0.03 2003 1727 134.5 +0.10 +0.13 0.980 49.8% +22 -144 +93 48.1% -0.22 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) +0.36
26 2001 1801 145.2 -38 +31 53.0% +0.15 7–8 (47%) 11–6 (65%) -0.92 2004 1887 148.7 +1.38 +2.62 1.092 51.5% +33 -284 -100 60.2% +0.52 12–6 (67%) 14–7 (67%) +0.23
27 2002 1796 149.7 -97 +231 56.1% +0.31 12–6 (67%) 10–10 (50%) -0.07 2005 1862 154.9 +1.31 +3.44 1.125 52.2% +10 -139 -50 60.9% +0.77 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) -1.12
28 2003 1766 140.2 +1.04 -0.52 0.975 49.7% -38 +145 53.3% +0.12 9–9 (50%) 11–12 (48%) +0.43 2006 1863 140.5 -0.75 +2.34 1.039 50.6% +65 -104 60.0% +0.60 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) +0.78
29 2004 1666 140.3 -0.80 +0.58 0.975 49.6% +12 +168 47.6% -0.13 5–8 (38%) 7–11 (39%) +0.16 2007 1907 153.1 +4.21 +1.95 1.186 52.7% +55 -153 65.2% +0.94 1–1 8–5 (62%) -1.12
30 2005 1621 122.1 -2.00 -1.30 0.884 48.1% +8 +73 38.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–8 (33%) +0.05 2008 1889 153.4 +2.15 +3.22 1.128 51.9% +5 -79 -37 57.0% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) -1.13
31 2006 1633 114.2 -1.10 -0.27 0.951 48.7% +74 54.5% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.35 2009 1762 145.0 -1.02 -0.24 0.930 49.3% +63 +45 +54 48.5% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) -1.73
32 2010 1722 106.1 +0.99 -2.77 0.774 46.3% +51 27.3% -1.09 1–1 0–1 -0.60
Career 2005 150.8 -0.47 -0.32 0.950 49.2% -89 +157 -169 55.7% +0.39 110–90 (55%) 109–110 (50%) 99.9 -0.10 1995 155.1 +1.02 +1.86 1.060 51.2% +25 -127 -17 56.7% +0.45 106–67 (61%) 107–77 (58%) 111.9 -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.