H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Albert Costa vs Oliver Gross H2H: 2-1
Albert Costa holds a 2–1 lead over Oliver Gross in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 2–0 on clay, while Oliver Gross leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Oliver Gross won the 1998 US Open first round 2-6 4-6 7-5 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Oliver Gross | 2-6 4-6 7-5 6-2 6-4 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| May 7, 1998* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-2 6-2 | Oliver Gross | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1994* | Montevideo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Oliver Gross | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Oliver Gross | #1,430 | #60 | 655 | 1,701 | 49 | 79 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Oliver Gross | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #101 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #126 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #97 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #156 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #458 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |