H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Albert Costa vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 4-1

Albert Costa holds a 4–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2003 Vienna third round 6-4 6-4.

ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2003* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Albert Costa #23 6-4 6-4 Sargis Sargsian #48 Match data
Apr 26, 2000* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay Sargis Sargsian #54 7-6(2) 6-4 Albert Costa #18 Match data
Oct 2, 1999* Bucharest ATP 250 QF Clay Albert Costa #25 6-2 1-6 6-1 Sargis Sargsian #61 Match data
Mar 18, 1998* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Albert Costa #21 7-5 6-1 Sargis Sargsian #77 Match data
Mar 6, 1998* Scottsdale ATP 250 R16 Hard Albert Costa #22 6-3 3-6 6-1 Sargis Sargsian #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Costa Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1