H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Albert Costa vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 2-0
Albert Costa holds a 2–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2004 Australian Open second round 6-7(5) 7-5 4-6 6-4 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Albert Costa | 6-7(5) 7-5 4-6 6-4 8-6 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2001* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Costa | 3-1 (ret.) | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |