H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Albert Costa vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 2-0

Albert Costa holds a 2–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2004 Australian Open round of 64 6-7(5) 7-5 4-6 6-4 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Costa
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Wayne Arthurs
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Costa #27 6-7(5) 7-5 4-6 6-4 8-6 Wayne Arthurs #114 Match data Jan 23, 2004* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Albert Costa #65 3-1 (ret.) Wayne Arthurs #49 Match data Jul 26, 2001* R32 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 2,004 369 265 58.2% 1 1 0 2 8 12
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 123 153 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Costa Wayne Arthurs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,759 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1996 47–27 63.5% #13 1,745 0 4 — — — — — — —
22 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,819 0 6 — — — — — — —
23 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,761 0 8 — — — — — — —
24 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11 — — — — — — —
25 2000 29–23 55.8% #26 1,761 0 11 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0
26 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,801 0 11 — — — — — — —
27 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,795 1 12 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0
28 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,766 1 12 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0
29 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,666 1 12 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0
30 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,620 1 12 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,637 0 0
31 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,633 1 12 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,701 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 13–20 39.4% #101 1,557 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,621 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,625 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,667 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Costa Wayne Arthurs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1993 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 15 16 31 48.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 32 19 51 62.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 15 11 26 57.7% 31 9 40 77.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 21 7 28 75.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 34 9 43 79.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 30 9 39 76.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 12 13 25 48.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 8 8 16 50.0% 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 7 11 18 38.9% 25 8 33 75.8% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
29 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 9 10 19 47.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
30 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2001 10 15 25 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 8 14 22 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 1 8 9 11.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 11 14 25 44.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 102 106 208 49.0% 257 131 388 66.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 8 21 29 27.6% — 68 91 159 42.8% 18 31 49 36.7% 34 27 61 55.7% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 116/118 of Albert Costa's and 246/276 of Wayne Arthurs's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Costa Wayne Arthurs
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 2/3 7.5 3.5 49.9% 77.4% 60.4% 85.7% 12.5% 68.9% 34.5%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 6/7 18.2 6.0 53.2% 85.4% 55.7% 85.1% 29.4% 71.8% 31.2%
28 2003 41/43 5.9 2.7 59.8% 70.0% 51.6% 59.1% 40.0% 62.4% 36.7% 1999 21/23 17.0 4.1 56.2% 83.6% 58.5% 69.9% 26.0% 72.5% 29.2%
29 2004 41/41 5.3 2.2 59.9% 67.9% 50.4% 51.2% 41.3% 60.9% 38.1% 2000 22/31 15.3 6.6 53.1% 79.6% 56.9% 65.9% 32.0% 69.0% 27.2%
30 2005 30/30 2.4 2.1 66.6% 65.4% 49.2% 55.5% 41.3% 59.6% 35.7% 2001 37/42 15.4 5.2 53.2% 81.3% 56.6% 67.2% 41.3% 69.8% 31.6%
31 2006 4/4 2.0 2.5 72.4% 60.5% 44.1% 40.4% 35.0% 56.2% 41.7% 2002 38/47 16.4 5.3 58.2% 81.0% 53.9% 72.7% 30.8% 69.7% 31.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 33/33 14.6 4.6 57.5% 78.5% 53.1% 61.1% 28.5% 67.6% 26.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 30/33 14.8 5.5 56.2% 77.6% 53.2% 72.0% 35.2% 66.6% 29.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 35/35 15.2 5.1 55.3% 82.1% 55.4% 65.2% 24.4% 70.2% 30.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 16/16 19.3 4.8 56.9% 81.0% 53.9% 61.1% 31.8% 69.4% 28.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/6 18.3 5.8 59.3% 69.2% 46.3% 60.5% 33.6% 60.3% 27.2%
Career — 116/634 4.7 2.4 62.0% 67.7% 50.3% 54.7% 40.6% 60.9% 37.1% — 246/276 15.8 5.2 55.8% 80.3% 54.9% 67.7% 31.3% 69.1% 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Costa Wayne Arthurs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1993 1522 107.4 — — — — — +38 — 45.5% -0.36 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 1583 132.9 — — — — — +66 — 40.5% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1760 146.1 — — — — -261 +67 — 61.1% +0.65 8–10 (44%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 1745 145.0 — — — — -165 +221 -169 58.8% +0.76 17–10 (63%) 12–19 (39%) — +2.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 1819 155.1 — — — — -84 +151 — 64.4% +0.93 4–8 (33%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 1762 150.6 — — — — -117 +288 — 60.8% +0.70 14–7 (67%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 1810 148.6 — — — — -141 +220 — 60.4% +0.68 13–6 (68%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 1761 143.3 — — — — -86 +190 — 53.8% +0.47 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.03 1996 1500 104.7 -0.05 -0.39 1.112 51.2% — — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.13
26 2001 1801 145.2 — — — — -38 +31 — 53.0% +0.15 7–8 (47%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1796 149.7 — — — — -97 +231 — 56.1% +0.31 12–6 (67%) 10–10 (50%) — -0.07 1998 1568 120.7 +4.91 -3.72 1.108 51.8% +19 -8 — 52.6% 0.00 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.21
28 2003 1766 140.2 +1.04 -0.52 0.975 49.7% -38 +145 — 53.3% +0.12 9–9 (50%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.43 1999 1652 125.2 +6.73 -4.44 1.062 50.8% -84 — +63 53.1% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 15–11 (58%) — +0.57
29 2004 1666 140.3 -0.80 +0.58 0.975 49.6% +12 +168 — 47.6% -0.13 5–8 (38%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.16 2000 1700 134.3 +4.47 -5.48 0.877 48.7% -6 -214 +1 45.1% -0.21 2–5 (29%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.74
30 2005 1621 122.1 -2.00 -1.30 0.884 48.1% +8 +73 — 38.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.05 2001 1637 134.5 +6.51 -3.67 1.047 50.8% -26 -53 +51 49.1% +0.21 7–9 (44%) 13–22 (37%) — -0.69
31 2006 1633 114.2 -1.10 -0.27 0.951 48.7% — +74 — 54.5% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.35 2002 1701 132.5 +5.52 -5.12 1.021 50.5% -74 -103 +52 48.0% -0.03 12–9 (57%) 19–23 (45%) — +0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1612 126.7 +4.04 -7.94 0.817 47.1% +12 -96 +126 37.8% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.96
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1557 126.0 +1.95 -5.15 0.873 48.5% +46 -38 +71 41.7% -0.36 4–8 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +0.89
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1621 128.8 +5.90 -5.67 1.006 49.9% +11 -77 +14 46.6% -0.06 7–5 (58%) 13–18 (42%) — +0.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1625 120.7 +3.77 -4.98 0.940 49.0% -21 — +42 39.5% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.02
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1668 109.1 -1.63 -3.62 0.685 44.3% -80 — +91 60.0% +0.45 2–0 3–4 (43%) — +0.58
Career — 2005 150.8 -0.47 -0.32 0.950 49.2% -89 +157 -169 55.7% +0.39 110–90 (55%) 109–110 (50%) 99.9 -0.10 — 1781 134.2 +4.75 -5.22 0.952 49.4% -13 -84 +54 46.1% -0.16 46–48 (49%) 109–134 (45%) 100.5 -0.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.