H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Albert Portas vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 2-0
Albert Portas holds a 2–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Portas leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 2002 Roland Garros second round 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Albert Portas | 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
| May 26, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-2 6-2 6-4 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Portas | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |