H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Albert Portas vs Cristiano Caratti H2H: 1-0
Albert Portas holds a 1–0 lead over Cristiano Caratti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Portas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 2001 US Open first round 6-1 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Albert Portas | 6-1 6-4 7-6(4) | Cristiano Caratti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Cristiano Caratti | #836 | #26 | 932 | 1,806 | 71 | 115 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Portas | Cristiano Caratti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #160 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #129 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #82 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #140 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #156 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #138 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #135 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |