H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Albert Portas vs David Sanchez H2H: 2-1
Albert Portas holds a 2–1 lead over David Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Albert Portas leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, David Sanchez won the 2002 Acapulco fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2002* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Sanchez | 6-2 7-5 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2001* | Palermo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-3 6-3 | David Sanchez | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2001* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-4 6-3 | David Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| David Sanchez | #1,116 | #41 | 832 | 1,730 | 87 | 119 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Portas | David Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #74 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #60 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #50 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |