H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Albert Portas vs Jan Vacek H2H: 1-0
Albert Portas holds a 1–0 lead over Jan Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Portas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 2002 Miami Masters second round 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2002* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Albert Portas | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2 | Jan Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jan Vacek | #1,155 | #61 | 646 | 1,640 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Portas | Jan Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #110 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #129 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #176 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,463 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #563 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |