H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

Albert Portas vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 0-1

Jeff Tarango holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1999 Croatia Open Umag semifinal 7-6(8) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Portas
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #79 7-6(8) 6-0 Albert Portas #87 Match data Jul 31, 1999* SF Croatia Open Umag ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Portas #1,082 #19 1,350 1,826 142 198 41.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Portas Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1995 4–3 57.1% #119 1,549 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1996 0–4 0.0% #182 1,505 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1997 22–17 56.4% #35 1,623 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1998 13–24 35.1% #84 1,592 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1999 14–18 43.8% #90 1,598 0 0 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 2000 22–23 48.9% #51 1,633 0 0 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 2001 32–28 53.3% #20 1,684 0 1 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 2002 9–23 28.1% #88 1,525 0 1 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 2003 10–20 33.3% #85 1,523 0 1 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2004 4–16 20.0% #175 1,443 0 1 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2005 2–6 25.0% #119 1,437 0 1 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 2006 8–12 40.0% #140 1,522 0 1 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2007 2–3 40.0% #338 1,548 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Portas Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 10 16 26 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 2000 1 5 6 16.7% 18 15 33 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2001 2 8 10 20.0% 29 15 44 65.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 2002 3 7 10 30.0% 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 9 15 24 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2004 0 2 2 0.0% 4 14 18 22.2% — — — — — — — — 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 2005 — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2006 — — — — 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2007 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 11 38 49 22.4% 127 141 268 47.4% 3 11 14 21.4% 1 8 9 11.1% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 302/340 of Albert Portas's and 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Portas Jeff Tarango
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1993 1/1 1.0 2.0 54.9% 53.8% 37.5% 58.3% 0.0% 46.5% 23.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 7/7 1.0 2.4 62.3% 63.3% 50.9% 65.0% 38.1% 57.6% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 4/4 2.5 3.3 61.6% 58.5% 40.2% 42.1% 45.4% 51.6% 32.0% 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0%
23 1997 35/39 2.8 2.7 66.9% 63.8% 50.3% 51.5% 46.0% 59.2% 41.4% 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7%
24 1998 30/37 3.7 3.7 56.2% 64.0% 44.6% 49.1% 40.8% 55.7% 36.9% 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5%
25 1999 25/32 3.4 3.7 60.1% 66.5% 49.1% 52.6% 45.9% 59.3% 40.4% 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0%
26 2000 40/45 4.9 3.9 52.9% 72.2% 48.0% 54.6% 44.5% 60.6% 40.3% 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0%
27 2001 50/60 5.4 4.0 51.9% 73.6% 49.3% 51.8% 45.5% 61.7% 41.8% 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0%
28 2002 29/32 4.6 4.4 57.8% 68.5% 46.4% 61.3% 35.1% 59.1% 34.2% 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9%
29 2003 30/30 4.3 3.8 57.3% 67.2% 44.2% 53.2% 40.1% 57.3% 34.5% 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1%
30 2004 20/20 3.3 3.8 58.9% 67.0% 44.5% 54.6% 41.8% 57.4% 33.7% 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4%
31 2005 8/8 5.3 4.0 56.2% 68.5% 49.4% 60.2% 35.4% 59.4% 41.0% 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0%
32 2006 20/20 5.0 3.3 52.4% 70.8% 43.7% 58.1% 38.4% 57.9% 35.0% 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3%
33 2007 3/5 4.0 2.0 53.1% 65.1% 44.6% 29.2% 68.5% 56.9% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 302/340 4.2 3.7 57.0% 68.3% 47.1% 53.8% 42.4% 58.8% 38.2% — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Portas Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 -0.19
19 1993 1489 97.9 -0.36 -2.93 0.431 38.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — +0.01 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) -0.05
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) +0.12
21 1995 1549 117.3 -1.11 +0.50 0.977 49.8% — +36 — 52.9% +0.29 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.19 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) +0.35
22 1996 1505 104.2 -1.11 -1.99 0.660 41.9% — +20 — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 0–1 -0.26 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) +0.07
23 1997 1624 137.9 -1.24 +2.07 1.015 50.4% -145 +129 — 53.1% +0.18 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) +0.28 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) -1.21
24 1998 1593 127.8 -4.13 -1.13 0.833 46.5% -75 +77 — 39.1% -1.10 5–8 (38%) 5–6 (45%) -0.52 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) -1.60
25 1999 1599 127.3 -1.18 +0.60 0.992 50.1% -115 +97 — 44.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–7 (42%) +0.15 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) +1.47
26 2000 1634 133.9 -1.01 +1.75 1.021 50.4% -170 +97 -55 49.1% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) -0.53 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) -1.34
27 2001 1684 138.5 +0.01 +2.56 1.089 51.3% -206 +145 — 53.9% +0.33 9–15 (38%) 13–11 (54%) -0.03 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) +0.93
28 2002 1526 118.0 -2.52 -3.44 0.838 47.1% -52 +128 — 34.6% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) +2.18 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) -1.45
29 2003 1523 121.5 -3.46 -2.15 0.808 46.4% -58 +89 — 32.9% -1.30 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) +0.03 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) +0.03
30 2004 1444 107.2 -4.07 -3.59 0.791 45.9% — +62 — 26.1% -1.35 0–3 (0%) 1–4 (20%) +1.14 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) +1.16
31 2005 1438 117.9 -0.16 +0.12 1.010 50.3% — +45 — 33.3% -0.56 0–2 0–2 -0.17 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) -0.28
32 2006 1522 120.5 -1.93 -2.12 0.831 46.7% — +46 — 37.5% -0.98 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) -0.98 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) +0.01
33 2007 1548 107.4 -0.42 -2.10 0.839 46.7% — +48 — 40.0% -0.70 — 0–1 +0.30 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — -0.06
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1826 132.5 -1.82 -0.13 0.929 48.7% -125 +97 -55 43.3% -0.48 43–57 (43%) 49–58 (46%) +0.53 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.