H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

Albert Portas vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-0

Albert Portas holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Portas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 2006 Estoril Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Portas
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Portas #100 6-4 6-3 Justin Gimelstob #97 Match data May 6, 2006* QF Estoril Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Portas #1,082 #19 1,350 1,826 142 198 41.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Portas Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 1995 4–3 57.1% #119 1,549 0 0 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 1996 0–4 0.0% #182 1,505 0 0 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 1997 22–17 56.4% #35 1,623 0 0 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 1998 13–24 35.1% #84 1,592 0 0 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 1999 14–18 43.8% #90 1,598 0 0 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 2000 22–23 48.9% #51 1,633 0 0 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 2001 32–28 53.3% #20 1,684 0 1 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 2002 9–23 28.1% #88 1,525 0 1 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2003 10–20 33.3% #85 1,523 0 1 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 2004 4–16 20.0% #175 1,443 0 1 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0
31 2005 2–6 25.0% #119 1,437 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2006 8–12 40.0% #140 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2007 2–3 40.0% #338 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Portas Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1995 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1996 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 10 16 26 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2000 1 5 6 16.7% 18 15 33 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2001 2 8 10 20.0% 29 15 44 65.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2002 3 7 10 30.0% 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 9 15 24 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 2004 0 2 2 0.0% 4 14 18 22.2% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 — — — — 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 11 38 49 22.4% 127 141 268 47.4% 3 11 14 21.4% 1 8 9 11.1% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 302/340 of Albert Portas's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Portas Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 1993 1/1 1.0 2.0 54.9% 53.8% 37.5% 58.3% 0.0% 46.5% 23.1% 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 1995 7/7 1.0 2.4 62.3% 63.3% 50.9% 65.0% 38.1% 57.6% 41.5% 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 1996 4/4 2.5 3.3 61.6% 58.5% 40.2% 42.1% 45.4% 51.6% 32.0% 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 1997 35/39 2.8 2.7 66.9% 63.8% 50.3% 51.5% 46.0% 59.2% 41.4% 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 1998 30/37 3.7 3.7 56.2% 64.0% 44.6% 49.1% 40.8% 55.7% 36.9% 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 1999 25/32 3.4 3.7 60.1% 66.5% 49.1% 52.6% 45.9% 59.3% 40.4% 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 2000 40/45 4.9 3.9 52.9% 72.2% 48.0% 54.6% 44.5% 60.6% 40.3% 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 2001 50/60 5.4 4.0 51.9% 73.6% 49.3% 51.8% 45.5% 61.7% 41.8% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 2002 29/32 4.6 4.4 57.8% 68.5% 46.4% 61.3% 35.1% 59.1% 34.2% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2003 30/30 4.3 3.8 57.3% 67.2% 44.2% 53.2% 40.1% 57.3% 34.5% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 2004 20/20 3.3 3.8 58.9% 67.0% 44.5% 54.6% 41.8% 57.4% 33.7% 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
31 2005 8/8 5.3 4.0 56.2% 68.5% 49.4% 60.2% 35.4% 59.4% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 20/20 5.0 3.3 52.4% 70.8% 43.7% 58.1% 38.4% 57.9% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 3/5 4.0 2.0 53.1% 65.1% 44.6% 29.2% 68.5% 56.9% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 302/340 4.2 3.7 57.0% 68.3% 47.1% 53.8% 42.4% 58.8% 38.2% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Portas Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — -0.13
19 1993 1489 97.9 -0.36 -2.93 0.431 38.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — +0.01 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) -0.63
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) +0.60
21 1995 1549 117.3 -1.11 +0.50 0.977 49.8% — +36 — 52.9% +0.29 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.19 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) -0.12
22 1996 1505 104.2 -1.11 -1.99 0.660 41.9% — +20 — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 0–1 -0.26 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) -1.22
23 1997 1624 137.9 -1.24 +2.07 1.015 50.4% -145 +129 — 53.1% +0.18 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) +0.28 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) +0.17
24 1998 1593 127.8 -4.13 -1.13 0.833 46.5% -75 +77 — 39.1% -1.10 5–8 (38%) 5–6 (45%) -0.52 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) +0.32
25 1999 1599 127.3 -1.18 +0.60 0.992 50.1% -115 +97 — 44.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–7 (42%) +0.15 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) -0.03
26 2000 1634 133.9 -1.01 +1.75 1.021 50.4% -170 +97 -55 49.1% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) -0.53 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) +1.70
27 2001 1684 138.5 +0.01 +2.56 1.089 51.3% -206 +145 — 53.9% +0.33 9–15 (38%) 13–11 (54%) -0.03 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — -0.42
28 2002 1526 118.0 -2.52 -3.44 0.838 47.1% -52 +128 — 34.6% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) +2.18 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) -0.05
29 2003 1523 121.5 -3.46 -2.15 0.808 46.4% -58 +89 — 32.9% -1.30 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) +0.03 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) +0.54
30 2004 1444 107.2 -4.07 -3.59 0.791 45.9% — +62 — 26.1% -1.35 0–3 (0%) 1–4 (20%) +1.14 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 -0.45
31 2005 1438 117.9 -0.16 +0.12 1.010 50.3% — +45 — 33.3% -0.56 0–2 0–2 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1522 120.5 -1.93 -2.12 0.831 46.7% — +46 — 37.5% -0.98 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1548 107.4 -0.42 -2.10 0.839 46.7% — +48 — 40.0% -0.70 — 0–1 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1826 132.5 -1.82 -0.13 0.929 48.7% -125 +97 -55 43.3% -0.48 43–57 (43%) 49–58 (46%) +0.53 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.