H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Albert Portas vs Noam Okun H2H: 0-1
Noam Okun holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Noam Okun leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Noam Okun won the 2002 Scottsdale fourth round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2002* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Noam Okun | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Albert Portas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Noam Okun | #1,046 | #95 | 411 | 1,628 | 20 | 43 | 31.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Portas | Noam Okun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #128 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #194 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #431 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |