H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Albert Portas vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 3-2

Albert Portas holds a 3–2 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Albert Portas leads 2–1 on clay, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2003 Austrian Open Kitzbühel round of 32 7-6(4) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Portas
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sargis Sargsian #54 7-6(4) 6-1 Albert Portas #85 Match data Jul 24, 2003* R32 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Albert Portas #25 6-3 7-6(3) Sargis Sargsian #104 Match data Jul 28, 2001* SF Sopot ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Albert Portas #48 6-3 6-2 Sargis Sargsian #80 Match data Jul 13, 2000* R32 Swedish Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Albert Portas #88 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 Sargis Sargsian #86 Match data Feb 17, 1999* R64 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Sargis Sargsian #64 6-0 7-5 6-2 Albert Portas #76 Match data Jun 24, 1998* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Portas #1,082 #19 1,350 1,826 142 198 41.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 156 208 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Portas Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1995 4–3 57.1% #119 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1996 0–4 0.0% #182 1,505 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1997 22–17 56.4% #35 1,623 0 0 1996 4–6 40.0% #104 1,576 0 0
24 1998 13–24 35.1% #84 1,592 0 0 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,628 0 1
25 1999 14–18 43.8% #90 1,598 0 0 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,617 0 1
26 2000 22–23 48.9% #51 1,633 0 0 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,636 0 1
27 2001 32–28 53.3% #20 1,684 0 1 2000 15–26 36.6% #94 1,566 0 1
28 2002 9–23 28.1% #88 1,525 0 1 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,624 0 1
29 2003 10–20 33.3% #85 1,523 0 1 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,649 0 1
30 2004 4–16 20.0% #175 1,443 0 1 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2005 2–6 25.0% #119 1,437 0 1 2004 17–27 38.6% #75 1,697 0 1
32 2006 8–12 40.0% #140 1,522 0 1 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,589 0 1
33 2007 2–3 40.0% #338 1,548 0 1 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Portas Sargis Sargsian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 10 16 26 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2000 1 5 6 16.7% 18 15 33 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2001 2 8 10 20.0% 29 15 44 65.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 6 12 18 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2002 3 7 10 30.0% 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 7 10 17 41.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 9 15 24 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2004 0 2 2 0.0% 4 14 18 22.2% — — — — — — — — 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
31 2005 — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 2006 — — — — 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2007 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 11 38 49 22.4% 127 141 268 47.4% 3 11 14 21.4% 1 8 9 11.1% — 68 103 171 39.8% 45 58 103 43.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 15 17 32 46.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 302/340 of Albert Portas's and 313/364 of Sargis Sargsian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Portas Sargis Sargsian
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1993 1/1 1.0 2.0 54.9% 53.8% 37.5% 58.3% 0.0% 46.5% 23.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 2/2 1.0 3.0 62.4% 56.6% 57.6% 68.3% 34.5% 57.6% 36.0%
21 1995 7/7 1.0 2.4 62.3% 63.3% 50.9% 65.0% 38.1% 57.6% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 4/4 2.5 3.3 61.6% 58.5% 40.2% 42.1% 45.4% 51.6% 32.0% 1995 2/4 5.0 7.0 57.5% 78.7% 29.9% 46.7% 47.4% 58.4% 33.4%
23 1997 35/39 2.8 2.7 66.9% 63.8% 50.3% 51.5% 46.0% 59.2% 41.4% 1996 7/10 2.1 4.0 58.5% 69.3% 46.1% 51.7% 41.0% 60.0% 42.4%
24 1998 30/37 3.7 3.7 56.2% 64.0% 44.6% 49.1% 40.8% 55.7% 36.9% 1997 31/41 4.3 3.4 58.0% 66.1% 50.7% 54.6% 38.3% 59.6% 35.6%
25 1999 25/32 3.4 3.7 60.1% 66.5% 49.1% 52.6% 45.9% 59.3% 40.4% 1998 33/43 4.5 3.1 60.5% 71.0% 50.9% 61.1% 43.1% 63.0% 38.8%
26 2000 40/45 4.9 3.9 52.9% 72.2% 48.0% 54.6% 44.5% 60.6% 40.3% 1999 33/44 3.8 2.5 60.7% 70.1% 50.3% 68.4% 40.9% 62.0% 39.0%
27 2001 50/60 5.4 4.0 51.9% 73.6% 49.3% 51.8% 45.5% 61.7% 41.8% 2000 33/41 3.7 3.0 60.4% 66.5% 45.5% 55.1% 39.0% 58.0% 38.0%
28 2002 29/32 4.6 4.4 57.8% 68.5% 46.4% 61.3% 35.1% 59.1% 34.2% 2001 32/35 3.7 3.3 59.1% 68.7% 48.5% 54.0% 46.3% 60.2% 38.1%
29 2003 30/30 4.3 3.8 57.3% 67.2% 44.2% 53.2% 40.1% 57.3% 34.5% 2002 29/32 5.0 3.2 56.7% 67.3% 49.4% 51.7% 39.2% 59.6% 34.2%
30 2004 20/20 3.3 3.8 58.9% 67.0% 44.5% 54.6% 41.8% 57.4% 33.7% 2003 54/54 4.1 3.4 61.7% 69.5% 51.8% 57.0% 47.3% 62.8% 39.6%
31 2005 8/8 5.3 4.0 56.2% 68.5% 49.4% 60.2% 35.4% 59.4% 41.0% 2004 43/44 4.8 3.0 63.2% 67.8% 48.6% 52.9% 33.9% 60.3% 36.8%
32 2006 20/20 5.0 3.3 52.4% 70.8% 43.7% 58.1% 38.4% 57.9% 35.0% 2005 12/12 3.0 4.3 59.9% 56.7% 37.4% 46.5% 49.0% 48.7% 30.9%
33 2007 3/5 4.0 2.0 53.1% 65.1% 44.6% 29.2% 68.5% 56.9% 36.2% 2006 2/2 0.5 6.5 60.0% 56.3% 39.5% 57.7% 16.7% 49.5% 28.9%
Career — 302/340 4.2 3.7 57.0% 68.3% 47.1% 53.8% 42.4% 58.8% 38.2% — 313/364 4.1 3.2 60.3% 67.9% 48.9% 56.3% 41.4% 60.3% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Portas Sargis Sargsian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1993 1489 97.9 -0.36 -2.93 0.431 38.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1514 106.3 -1.99 -0.78 0.850 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
21 1995 1549 117.3 -1.11 +0.50 0.977 49.8% — +36 — 52.9% +0.29 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 1505 104.2 -1.11 -1.99 0.660 41.9% — +20 — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 1995 1568 112.7 -0.77 +0.75 0.802 46.7% +23 — — 40.0% -0.73 2–0 1–0 — -0.16
23 1997 1624 137.9 -1.24 +2.07 1.015 50.4% -145 +129 — 53.1% +0.18 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) — +0.28 1996 1577 128.3 -1.13 +3.09 1.060 51.0% +44 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
24 1998 1593 127.8 -4.13 -1.13 0.833 46.5% -75 +77 — 39.1% -1.10 5–8 (38%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.52 1997 1628 125.8 -1.73 -0.98 0.881 47.6% -2 -131 +80 42.7% -0.72 7–9 (44%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.39
25 1999 1599 127.3 -1.18 +0.60 0.992 50.1% -115 +97 — 44.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.15 1998 1618 121.9 +0.65 +0.48 1.050 50.9% -61 -75 +114 46.4% -0.07 6–11 (35%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.49
26 2000 1634 133.9 -1.01 +1.75 1.021 50.4% -170 +97 -55 49.1% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.53 1999 1637 132.5 +0.09 +1.23 1.029 50.7% -86 +41 +71 49.1% -0.06 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.70
27 2001 1684 138.5 +0.01 +2.56 1.089 51.3% -206 +145 — 53.9% +0.33 9–15 (38%) 13–11 (54%) — -0.03 2000 1566 128.7 -2.68 +0.64 0.906 47.9% -40 +100 +90 37.0% -0.66 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.47
28 2002 1526 118.0 -2.52 -3.44 0.838 47.1% -52 +128 — 34.6% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) — +2.18 2001 1625 130.0 -2.01 +0.60 0.956 49.3% -63 +51 +50 46.7% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20
29 2003 1523 121.5 -3.46 -2.15 0.808 46.4% -58 +89 — 32.9% -1.30 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) — +0.03 2002 1650 127.4 -1.35 -1.75 0.846 47.0% -4 -26 -15 41.7% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.86
30 2004 1444 107.2 -4.07 -3.59 0.791 45.9% — +62 — 26.1% -1.35 0–3 (0%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.14 2003 1775 142.7 +1.40 +2.44 1.066 51.2% -3 -112 -142 53.7% +0.49 4–6 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.63
31 2005 1438 117.9 -0.16 +0.12 1.010 50.3% — +45 — 33.3% -0.56 0–2 0–2 — -0.17 2004 1697 135.9 -1.71 +0.83 0.929 48.5% +25 -58 -94 40.7% -0.52 8–6 (57%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.22
32 2006 1522 120.5 -1.93 -2.12 0.831 46.7% — +46 — 37.5% -0.98 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.98 2005 1589 91.9 -8.24 -4.38 0.602 40.3% +84 +23 -61 22.2% -2.26 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.23
33 2007 1548 107.4 -0.42 -2.10 0.839 46.7% — +48 — 40.0% -0.70 — 0–1 — +0.30 2006 1577 106.8 -0.31 -1.11 0.571 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.39
Career — 1826 132.5 -1.82 -0.13 0.929 48.7% -125 +97 -55 43.3% -0.48 43–57 (43%) 49–58 (46%) 96.9 +0.53 — 1812 135.5 -1.06 +0.48 0.943 48.9% -15 -12 +31 44.2% -0.34 49–64 (43%) 60–59 (50%) 99.6 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.