H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Albert Portas vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 3-2

Albert Portas holds a 3–2 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Albert Portas leads 2–1 on clay, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2003 Kitzbuhel third round 7-6(4) 6-1.

ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 24, 2003* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Sargis Sargsian #54 7-6(4) 6-1 Albert Portas #85 Match data
Jul 28, 2001* Sopot ATP 250 SF Clay Albert Portas #25 6-3 7-6(3) Sargis Sargsian #104 Match data
Jul 13, 2000* Bastad ATP 250 R32 Clay Albert Portas #48 6-3 6-2 Sargis Sargsian #80 Match data
Feb 17, 1999* Memphis ATP 250 R64 Hard Albert Portas #88 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 Sargis Sargsian #86 Match data
Jun 24, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Sargis Sargsian #64 6-0 7-5 6-2 Albert Portas #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Albert Portas #1,082 #19 1,350 1,826 142 198 41.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Portas Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1993 0–1 0.0% #392 1,489 0 0
20 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1995 4–3 57.1% #119 1,548 0 0
22 1996 0–4 0.0% #182 1,505 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1997 22–17 56.4% #35 1,623 0 0 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 1998 13–24 35.1% #84 1,594 0 0 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 1999 14–18 43.8% #90 1,599 0 0 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 2000 22–23 48.9% #51 1,634 0 0 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 2001 32–28 53.3% #20 1,684 0 1 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2002 9–23 28.1% #88 1,525 0 1 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2003 10–20 33.3% #85 1,523 0 1 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2004 4–16 20.0% #175 1,443 0 1 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2005 2–6 25.0% #119 1,437 0 1 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2006 8–12 40.0% #140 1,521 0 1 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 2007 2–3 40.0% #338 1,548 0 1 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1