H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Albert Portas vs Stefan Koubek H2H: 1-2
Stefan Koubek holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Stefan Koubek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stefan Koubek won the 2002 Nottingham third round 7-6(8) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 49
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2002* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Stefan Koubek | 7-6(8) 6-4 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2000* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Stefan Koubek | 6-1 6-3 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1999* | San Marino | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-4 6-2 | Stefan Koubek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Stefan Koubek | #906 | #20 | 1,143 | 1,794 | 195 | 235 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Portas | Stefan Koubek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #125 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #54 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #53 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #60 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #80 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #47 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #135 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |