H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 1-1
Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Andreas Seppi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andreas Seppi leads 1–0 on clay, while Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2018 Shenzhen third round 6-7(5) 7-6(7) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2018* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-7(5) 7-6(7) 6-3 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| May 2, 2014* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andreas Seppi | 6-3 6-4 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
| Nov 7, 2010 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Andreas Seppi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |