H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs David Ferrer H2H: 2-6

David Ferrer holds a 6–2 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 4–2 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2019 Buenos Aires fourth round 3-6 7-6(9) 6-3.

Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 15, 2019* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Albert Ramos-Vinolas #96 3-6 7-6(9) 6-3 David Ferrer #149 Match data
Jul 16, 2016* Bastad ATP 250 SF Clay Albert Ramos-Vinolas #35 7-5 6-4 David Ferrer #13 Match data
Feb 19, 2016* Rio de Janeiro ATP 250 R16 Clay David Ferrer #6 4-6 6-1 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #47 Match data
Oct 22, 2015* Vienna ATP 500 R32 Hard David Ferrer #8 1-6 6-3 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #58 Match data
May 6, 2015* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Ferrer #8 6-4 6-0 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #65 Match data
May 7, 2014* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Ferrer #5 7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #115 Match data
Feb 15, 2014* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay David Ferrer #5 6-1 6-2 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #92 Match data
Oct 25, 2012* Valencia ATP 250 R16 Hard David Ferrer #5 6-4 6-2 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,966 276 327 45.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas David Ferrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,732 0 0 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,647 0 0 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,725 0 0 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7
28 2016 34–30 53.1% #27 1,886 0 1 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,660 0 4 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,570 0 4 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,570 0 4 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27