H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs David Nalbandian H2H: 0-1
David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2012 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2012* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-3 6-4 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | David Nalbandian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |