H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs David Nalbandian H2H: 0-1

David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2012 Italian Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #42 6-3 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #39 Match data May 15, 2012* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas David Nalbandian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas David Nalbandian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — — 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — — 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — — — — — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 529/545 of David Nalbandian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas David Nalbandian
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3%
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8%
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas David Nalbandian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.30
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.80
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.37
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) — +0.96
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) — +0.79
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) — +0.24
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.27
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) — +1.15
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.13
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) — -0.83
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) — -2.55
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.