H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 2-6

Federico Delbonis holds a 6–2 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Federico Delbonis leads 6–2 on clay. Most recently, Federico Delbonis won the 2021 Hamburg Open second round 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main-draw meetings
Federico Delbonis
ARG Age 35 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Federico Delbonis #48 6-3 7-6(4) Albert Ramos-Vinolas #41 Match data Jul 16, 2021* R16 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay
Federico Delbonis #77 7-6(5) 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #37 Match data May 5, 2021* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Federico Delbonis #84 7-6(5) 7-5 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #91 Match data May 24, 2019* QF Geneva Open ATP 250 Clay
Federico Delbonis #74 7-5 6-0 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #84 Match data Apr 14, 2019* Q2 Q Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #93 3-6 7-5 6-3 Federico Delbonis #80 Match data Feb 22, 2019* R16 Rio Open ATP 500 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #41 2-6 7-5 6-1 Federico Delbonis #70 Match data May 15, 2018* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Federico Delbonis #79 6-2 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #41 Match data May 3, 2018* R32 Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay
Federico Delbonis #36 7-6(6) 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #57 Match data Apr 30, 2016* QF Istanbul ATP 250 Clay
Federico Delbonis #131 6-3 6-2 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #39 Match data May 8, 2012* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #117 4-6 6-1 6-2 Federico Delbonis #197 Match data May 23, 2011* Q2 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Federico Delbonis #939 #33 1,435 1,898 158 196 44.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Federico Delbonis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #195 1,530 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #160 1,455 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 3–2 60.0% #166 1,551 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2012 6–9 40.0% #133 1,715 0 0
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2013 12–8 60.0% #55 1,748 0 0
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2014 20–27 42.6% #60 1,659 0 1
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2015 15–18 45.5% #52 1,693 0 1
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2016 24–23 51.1% #41 1,752 0 2
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2017 11–10 52.4% #68 1,810 0 2
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2018 11–18 37.9% #80 1,722 0 2
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2019 14–20 41.2% #76 1,686 0 2
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2020 9–12 42.9% #82 1,705 0 2
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2021 24–24 50.0% #44 1,715 0 2
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2022 8–21 27.6% #125 1,671 0 2
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2023 1–1 50.0% #279 1,598 0 2
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Federico Delbonis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — —
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2013 2 2 4 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2014 2 12 14 14.3% 18 13 31 58.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 10 14 24 41.7% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2018 1 4 5 20.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2020 1 5 6 16.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — —
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 0 10 10 0.0% 24 13 37 64.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2023 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — 25 71 96 26.0% 133 113 246 54.1% 0 12 12 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 352/354 of Federico Delbonis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Federico Delbonis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 2.0 1.0 59.7% 62.5% 48.1% 28.6% 33.3% 56.7% 39.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 5.5 4.0 51.0% 65.3% 51.2% 42.5% 100.0% 58.0% 30.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 5/5 2.6 2.6 55.3% 72.4% 57.3% 71.3% 49.8% 65.7% 42.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 15/15 2.6 2.7 62.6% 71.7% 50.7% 57.0% 45.9% 63.6% 38.8%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% 2013 20/20 3.3 3.0 60.5% 71.8% 53.1% 65.2% 39.5% 64.6% 36.0%
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2014 47/47 4.1 2.6 62.4% 71.1% 53.2% 58.2% 37.9% 64.5% 36.0%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2015 33/33 3.3 3.8 59.1% 68.0% 49.7% 53.1% 40.0% 60.5% 37.1%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2016 46/47 5.0 3.8 57.7% 72.7% 53.6% 54.7% 42.5% 64.7% 37.9%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2017 21/21 2.9 3.1 62.0% 69.3% 53.0% 58.4% 38.9% 63.1% 36.6%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2018 29/29 3.3 3.8 60.7% 68.1% 50.9% 59.1% 37.8% 61.4% 37.2%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2019 34/34 3.5 4.4 61.8% 67.3% 49.9% 55.2% 45.3% 60.6% 37.1%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2020 21/21 3.9 4.1 62.0% 69.7% 47.0% 59.5% 31.9% 60.8% 36.3%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2021 47/48 3.0 3.3 62.9% 67.9% 48.5% 58.5% 39.7% 60.8% 38.9%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% 2022 29/29 3.2 3.3 65.7% 65.9% 46.5% 52.3% 52.0% 59.2% 33.8%
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% 2023 2/2 2.0 5.0 60.7% 63.1% 57.1% 66.7% 49.4% 61.2% 40.5%
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 352/354 3.6 3.4 61.3% 69.3% 50.8% 57.1% 41.5% 62.2% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Federico Delbonis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1531 104.9 +1.54 +1.69 0.900 47.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.22
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1455 98.1 -1.64 -4.62 0.728 44.6% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1551 118.9 +1.25 +1.71 1.229 53.8% — +96 — 63.6% +1.55 0–1 0–1 — +0.12
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1716 134.1 +0.78 +0.82 1.066 51.0% — +108 — 42.4% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 0.00
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 +0.05 2013 1748 139.4 +1.43 -0.37 1.017 50.3% -261 +198 — 56.3% +0.02 3–1 (75%) 9–4 (69%) 107.0 -0.16
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 99.4 -0.23 2014 1659 139.9 +0.59 -0.67 1.015 50.1% -187 +188 — 43.9% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 6–14 (30%) 92.5 +0.52
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) 96.4 -0.55 2015 1694 141.9 -2.55 +0.99 0.939 48.9% -227 +164 — 44.4% -0.62 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) 102.2 -1.35
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) 94.2 +0.49 2016 1752 151.4 +0.81 +1.24 1.074 51.0% -113 +125 — 50.8% +0.09 8–11 (42%) 14–13 (52%) 101.9 +0.29
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) 95.2 -1.20 2017 1810 146.8 -0.28 -0.65 0.992 49.8% -88 +44 — 48.9% -0.02 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 104.7 -0.11
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) 97.7 -1.24 2018 1722 141.7 -1.88 +0.36 0.963 49.3% -54 +64 — 39.7% -0.44 3–7 (30%) 6–9 (40%) 92.3 -1.63
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) 101.8 -2.25 2019 1687 143.1 -2.47 +0.35 0.941 48.8% -62 +160 — 42.7% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 6–15 (29%) 94.2 +0.44
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) 99.4 +3.34 2020 1706 134.9 -1.28 -1.40 0.926 48.8% -73 +115 — 45.3% -0.43 2–4 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.1 -0.54
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) 100.6 +2.45 2021 1716 141.7 -1.58 +1.20 0.991 49.7% -195 +201 — 47.1% -0.02 10–5 (67%) 7–12 (37%) 100.2 +1.51
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) 97.2 -1.29 2022 1671 132.0 -3.23 -1.65 0.828 47.0% -137 +96 — 33.3% -1.01 2–5 (29%) 1–6 (14%) 90.2 -0.76
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) 89.7 +0.07 2023 1599 111.2 +1.18 -0.42 1.044 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.33 1–1 1–1 — -0.12
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) 93.9 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) 97.3 +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) 93.6 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 1898 145.2 -0.88 +0.15 0.979 49.6% -142 +141 — 45.0% -0.25 51–62 (45%) 69–91 (43%) 92.9 -0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.