H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 3-0

Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 3–0 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2016 Quito quarterfinal 7-5 4-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 6, 2016* Quito ATP 250 QF Clay Albert Ramos-Vinolas #55 7-5 4-3 (ret.) Feliciano Lopez #22 Match data
Oct 31, 2012* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Albert Ramos-Vinolas #48 7-6(5) 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #36 Match data
Mar 24, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Albert Ramos-Vinolas #56 6-4 7-6(5) Feliciano Lopez #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,966 276 327 45.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,732 0 0 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,647 0 0 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,725 0 0 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2016 34–30 53.1% #27 1,886 0 1 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,660 0 4 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,570 0 4 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,570 0 4 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7