H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Fernando Gonzalez H2H: 1-1
Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Fernando Gonzalez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2012 Buenos Aires fourth round 7-6(6) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2012* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 7-6(6) 7-6(5) | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2010* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-4 6-7(8) 6-3 | Fernando Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Fernando Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |